Student Can't Take G-Trains Due to Debt She Took a...

主要观点总结

本文讲述了小赵因涉及私人借贷纠纷被限制消费并无法购买高铁票的故事。经过调查，发现她父亲的债务问题导致她无辜被卷入其中。经过协商和调查，最终成功解除了她的债务和限制。

关键观点总结

关键观点1: 小赵在尝试购买高铁票时遇到无法购买的问题。

小赵被告知因被起诉违反信任而无法购买高铁票。

关键观点2: 小赵被卷入其父亲的债务纠纷。

其父曾向朋友借款作为公司资本，但未按承诺偿还债务。导致小赵及其家人被追讨债务并受到限制消费的限制。

关键观点3: 小赵的权益受到保护。

经过调查，发现小赵作为未成年人在债务协议中被监护人误导涉及。最终法院裁定取消调解协议并重新开始新的调解，成功解除了小赵的债务和限制。

正文

请到「今天看啥」查看全文

"I've never seen the IOU note and neither did I agree to sign it. At the age of 12, I was too young to understand such a thing." Xiaozhao said.

Xiaozhao filed a complaint with the Minhang Procuratorate which quickly launched a team to investigate the case.

The team found that although Xiaozhao was listed as a co-defendant in the mediation letter, she was not notified of the mediation. Furthermore, she neither appeared in court nor was she legally represented by a third party.

More importantly, the loans involved were all used for investment in the company founded by her father and never for family life or Xiaozhao's education expenses.

Li, the creditor, realized that Zhao was using a house he co-owned with his wife and daughter as collateral, thus he asked Zhao to include the names of his wife and daughter to make sure that he gets full ownership of the house in case Zhao could not pay the money back.

The team concluded that Xiaozhao as a minor, was put in a debt agreement by her guardian, who was supposed to always be in her interest and not otherwise. It suggested the court nullify the mediation agreement and start a new one.

After months, the new mediation was settled and it removed Xiaozhao's name as the co-defendant and her consumption restrictions were lifted.

Source: Yangzi Evening News Network

请到「今天看啥」查看全文